Mr. Elric, your comment is a reasonable one and I appreciate your time to interact with us in this thread. Because I view your description of the crime scene "The shell casings and the bullets matched the ones that were found in the murdered officer", tells me that you know more about this case than what I read pursuant to this post.

So yes, your comment is reasonable indeed. It compelled me to go back and re-read the article. Finding no shell casings language in the courts arguments in Mr. Davis appeals, I have to think you have a transcript of the whole case, which is very interesting.

Another thing I find interesting is your obvious assumptionthat someone in this thread has suggested that Mr. Davis is innocent and should walk.

Believe me sir, no one has ever suggested here he is not guilty. This issue here, and the only issue sir, is whether "Shouldn`t Innocence Matter""be", during appellate processes of condemned felons when evidence is conflicting as to the truth of the case in question.

Be assured sir, that I am in no way suggesting he is not guilty. I am strongly opposed however, of how the judicial appellate process is stacked against Mr. Davis, that`s all.