The Jury deliberation. I would like to know based on what evidence did they fine the defendant guilty, was it their passed knowledge, and history off the defendant. I believe in my opinion that the deliberation is not transcripted for one, and cannot be reviewed for incompetent decisions, predigest decisions, or verdict based perhaps on nothing valid. How would you know how they came to there decision off Guilty? The process is too simple while dealing with peoples lives in this system.

With this fact incombanation off the law of parties. A murder takes place, but it was never proved the defendant killed anyone gets 40 years based on an admission off agreeing to participate in a planed felony under the law. I know this is the law, and a crazy one designed to fill prisons, and death row prison cells with citizens living anywhere else most likely would not even see a jail cell.

With the Jury basically covered as an possible defense for an appeal, and believe me I am not saying Judge alone would be better based on some resent decision made by these educated adults in power that would in a reasonable person definition would be boarder line insanity.

My argument would be and always is 40 years sentence for a murder that was not proved you committed, but an admission through police interrogation agreeing to rob a person, and witness corroboration the story is there evidence that witness could be charged with the same crime if she never cooperated to testify. The sentence is too incisive for the crime. I personally amazed that people are not appealing these sentences based on cruel punishment. These 40 years sentences, and there was the one case a citizen from Canada the lady got convicted off possession off drugs in New Jersey, and got 40 years. These sentences are a flat 40 years there are no time reductions. In Canada the possession conviction would have got you 2 years with good time. What is the point off this sentence? This was a mother off three children, and has never been convicted off anything in her life. My pp I believe in my opinion would not have been charged with anything, but most defently would not be convicted off murdering anyone gets 40 years.

With no time reduction on a 40-year sentence, and no funds to appeal, what hope do these people have?

I am saying the sentences in the US are getting out off control, and with little amount off evidence to prove theses case. An admission is nothing, everyone knows about false confession, and admissions, and without the confession to this day who knows if it was valid. It self-incrimination evidence, easy lazy police work that is accept as valid, and true because the accused said it. It is not a deterrent for crime, but a lethal weapon to help convict a possible innocent citizen based on wordings off laws, and ordinary citizen deliberation.

My pp lawyer got paid, and if he was not so incompetent. I would say he took a buyout from the victim’s family to just sit there look educated, and say nothing.