I know with Jury selection in the US they have guidelines requirements. If any jury member after the fact was investigated and found not eligible to be on a Jury would this be ground for a new trial?

In my opinion I would never go to trial with a Jury, unless I had the jury in the bag before the trial started. $ There is a reason certain lawyers having winning records, and it is not because they are good at presenting a defense. These are my opinions, and they have kept me out off prison.

Lawyers are not going to go into the level off defense or battle off discussion with you unless instructed. A jury is Russian roulette, and I will not play unless I know what chamber has the bullet.

At the end off the day remember everyone go homes. The question is do you?

I know this thread is about Jury selection, but it get pathetic that laws are designed to convict a person on basically mere presence will get you 40 years. If you what a fair trial you have to look below the playing field like the State does. The State can make deals with basically anyone. I call it lying to save their skin from prison time, but testify to their knowledge off the crime or the person. If they can do this better start thinking lawyers are like boxers they get paid the same at the end off the game.